Policymaking

The Arizona Medical Association is physician-led and patient-focused. Our members drive organized medicine forward through year-round policymaking. By drafting, proposing, and adopting healthcare-related policies, our members steer the association's strategy.

Become a member to begin participating in our policymaking process!

What is Policymaking?

Policymaking is a core function of organized medicine.


It is the process by which members of the Arizona Medical Association decide where our organization should spend its time, energy, and resources. By proposing policies, members can direct the association to take action or a position on specific health care issues. If adopted, policies are added to our compendium and referenced by leadership, staff, and others.


All members are welcome to submit policies for consideration and comment on policies proposed by their colleagues. Eligible members are invited to vote.

The Policymaking Process

ArMA's policymaking process is conducted online several times each year. Members are encouraged to get involved every step of the way:

  • Call for Proposals

    During an annually recurring submission window, all members are welcome to submit a policy proposal. Authors should reference ArMA's Policy Compendium and drafting guidelines before submitting their proposal.

  • Committee Review

    ArMA's Reference Committee — comprised of volunteer physicians, residents & fellows, and medical students — meets to determine which submitted proposals meet the submission criteria. Accepted proposals advance. Rejected proposals are sent back to the authors for further revision.

  • Call for Comments

    Policies advanced by ArMA's Reference Committee are posted online for members to review. All members are encouraged to provide their feedback on the policies, including notes for expansion, clarification, and more. 


    These comments are then considered by the Reference Committee as it determines its final recommendation for each policy.


  • Call for Votes

    Eligible members receive a personalized ballot to vote on whether the proposed policies should be adopted. Ballots include recommendations from the Reference Committee based on member feedback.


    Eligible members include full-time physicians, residents, fellows, and medical students. Affiliate and out-of-state members are not eligible to vote.


What Happens to Adopted Policies?

Adopted policies are added to ArMA's Policy Compendium, which influences our legislative agenda, stance on key issues, strategic goals, and more.

Adopted policies instruct ArMA's Board of Directors on the strategy and operation of the association.

Adopted policies serve as a benchmark for the ArMA Advocacy Team when addressing state legislative issues.

How to Draft Policy Proposals

Research is the first step in developing a resolution. Solid data must support the requested action, and the resolution must be considered in light of the issue's overall history — including current ArMA actions, past policies, and positions of other organizations.

Rules for Writing an Effective Policy

Rule 1 — Structure

Every resolution must have a title, "whereas" clause(s), and "resolved" clause(s), and carry the society, committee, or author's name(s). The topic should be clear and concise. "Whereas" clauses explain the rationale; "resolved" clauses state the action called for.

Rule 2 — Quality

Limit "whereas" clauses to the minimum needed to support the "resolved" clause(s). Carefully verify all facts and data. Limit adjectives or qualifying adverbs that amount to editorial opinion — focus on the essentials.



Rule 3 — Self-contained Language

If adopted, only the "resolved" clause(s) remain. Each must stand alone, make sense independently, and avoid acronyms. Do not refer to other clauses. Every "resolved" clause must be explicit without the rest of the document present.


Rule 1 — Structure

Every resolution must have a title, "whereas" clause(s), and "resolved" clause(s), and carry the society, committee, or author's name(s). The topic should be clear and concise. "Whereas" clauses explain the rationale; "resolved" clauses state the action called for.



Rule 2 — Quality

Limit "whereas" clauses to the minimum needed to support the "resolved" clause(s). Carefully verify all facts and data. Limit adjectives or qualifying adverbs that amount to editorial opinion — focus on the essentials.



Rule 3 — Self-contained Language

If adopted, only the "resolved" clause(s) remain. Each must stand alone, make sense independently, and avoid acronyms. Do not refer to other clauses. Every "resolved" clause must be explicit without the rest of the document present.

Rule 4 — Brevity

Less is more. If "resolved" clauses become too long or complex, intent may be lost. It is better to split an idea into two "resolved" statements than to create a single clause that confuses everyone.




Rule 5 — One Issue of Focus

Only one issue should be addressed in each resolution. If multiple "resolved" clauses are included, each must relate to the central subject of the resolution.





Rule 6 — Due Diligence

Before submitting, consider: Is this of interest to many or few members? Is it within ArMA's scope? Is it relevant to ArMA's strategic priorities? Does it have cost implications? Has ArMA already addressed this?



Rule 4 — Brevity

Less is more. If "resolved" clauses become too long or complex, intent may be lost. It is better to split an idea into two "resolved" statements than to create a single clause that confuses everyone.




Rule 5 — One Issue of Focus

Only one issue should be addressed in each resolution. If multiple "resolved" clauses are included, each must relate to the central subject of the resolution.



Rule 6 — Due Diligence

Before submitting, consider: Is this of interest to many or few members? Is it within ArMA's scope? Is it relevant to ArMA's strategic priorities? Does it have cost implications? Has ArMA already addressed this?



Submission Criteria

To ensure high-quality and relevant submissions, ArMA's Reference Committee reviews proposed policies against the following criteria. If policies do not meet these benchmarks, then the Committee will ask the author to revise their language before resubmitting.

Does the resolution address a current need?



Does it reflect emerging health care trends?

Is it directly applicable to Arizona's healthcare,

physician, or patient communities?

Is it within ArMA's scope? If not, is it within the AMA's scope?

How to Get Involved

Submissions Closed

The submission window for ArMA's policymaking process is currently closed. The next

submission period is expected to open in Fall 2026. Please check back soon!

Governance Documents