Arizona Physician Groups Urge Protection of Patient–Doctor Decision-Making

November 24, 2025

Physician groups in Arizona are urging patients to base healthcare decisions on credible information and counseling from a trusted physician or medical professional amid confusion stemming from misinformation and partisan tension.

PHOENIX, Arizona — The physician community is increasingly concerned about the negative impacts of political and corporate interference on patients’ health. The spread of misinformation and a rise in partisan battles over healthcare are distracting our communities from the quality care patients deserve and physicians are trained to deliver.

The Arizona Medical Association (ArMA), the Arizona Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AzAAP), the Arizona Academy of Family Physicians (AzAFP), the Arizona Section of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AzACOG), the Arizona Healthcare Advocacy Coalition (AHAC), and the undersigned 
physician-led organizations stand behind healthcare informed by:

  • Rigorous scientific evidence and peer-reviewed research
  • The clinical expertise and professional judgment of licensed physicians
  • Established, widely recognized medical guidelines and best practices
  • The individual needs and circumstances of each patient and their health
  • Ethical principles that prioritize patient health, safety, and well-being

"Physicians are collectively committed to advancing healthcare decisions guided by the highest standards of evidence and clinical rigor,” explained Dr. Marc Leib, chair of AHAC, a coalition of more than a dozen physician organizations. “By championing data-driven practices in all aspects of healthcare, we aim to improve patient outcomes and ensure that policies reflect the best available science.”

High-quality healthcare depends on the practice of evidence-based medicine. In turn, evidence-based medicine depends on scientific studies conducted by experts free from influence or bias. When political or corporate interference overshadows this process, the integrity of healthcare is compromised.

“Healthcare is one of the most important systems in the nation,” stated Dr. Jason Jameson, a urologist and president of ArMA. “It impacts every single one of us. As a major system, healthcare has fine-tuned processes in place to protect patients, advance medicine, and create healthier communities. We must continue to rely on these proven processes to evolve in the field of medicine. If we do not, we risk undermining public health and harming patients.”

Healthcare, medicine, and science evolve continuously. New understandings in the field of medicine are gleaned from rigorous and peer-reviewed studies. Clinical practices are then refined as new evidence emerges. This evolution is a strength of modern medicine.

“Research has produced life-saving advancements in medicine, including diabetes management, immunizations, and anesthesia,” remarked Dr. Mariolga Mercado, a family physician and president of AzAFP. “These advancements do not happen overnight, and they shouldn’t because we are talking about people’s lives. Rather, they are the result of careful and peer-reviewed research conducted by physicians and medical experts over the span of decades, and they only work when patients are heard, respected, and free to choose after discussing benefits, risks, and alternatives with their doctor.”

When medicine becomes subject to politics or third-party decision-makers, it often results in conflicting guidance and creates confusion for patients. This confusion is harmful, and it worsens patient outcomes by delaying or diverting the care they need. A patient’s health can be complex, but the approach to delivering quality healthcare is straightforward.

"The physician-patient relationship is built on compassion and trust, and decisions made are evidence-based and shared between patient and physician," stated Dr. Tori Fewell, an OBGYN and chair of AzACOG. "When healthcare is subjected to political and corporate agendas, it erodes trust in medical professionals who have the expertise and compassion required to care for patients. Ultimately, this erosion leads to worsened patient outcomes.”

“Physician-led care means decisions are made in the exam room — between you and your doctor — based on individual needs, verified medical evidence, and the latest clinical guidelines,” said Dr. Jodi Carter, a pediatrician and president of AzAAP. “It also means that, if you ever have questions about your health or your children’s health, you can always bring them to your physician for clear, quality, and expert answers that you can trust to make important medical decisions.”

Arizona's physician community is calling on elected officials across the political spectrum to support a healthcare system where public health and medical decisions are made based on scientific evidence, clinical expertise, and individual patient needs. As physicians advocate for a reimagined healthcare system, they want patients to know: your care is at our core — not politics, not profit, not partisanship.

“As physicians, we put patient care above all else,” shared Dr. Jameson. “We’re asking that patients, elected officials, and community leaders do the same when it comes to decisions impacting their personal health and healthcare in Arizona.”

This release is signed and supported by 22 physician-led organizations in Arizona: 

  • American Academy of Pediatrics, Arizona Chapter
  • American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Arizona Section
  • American College of Physicians, Arizona Chapter
  • Arizona Academy of Family Physicians
  • Arizona Allergy & Asthma Society
  • The Arizona Clinical Oncology Society
  • Arizona College of Emergency Physicians
  • Arizona Dermatology Society
  • Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
  • Arizona Medical Association
  • Arizona Orthopaedic Society
  • Arizona Osteopathic Medical Association
  • Arizona Pain Society 
  • Arizona Psychiatric Society
  • Arizona Radiological Society
  • Arizona United Rheumatology Alliance
  • Arizona Society of Anesthesiologists
  • Arizona Society of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Arizona Society of Eye Physicians & Surgeons
  • Arizona Urological Society
  • Maricopa County Medical Society
  • Pima County Medical Society

About Arizona Medical Association 


Fostering medicine. Championing care. Serving Arizona.


The Arizona Medical Association is the largest organization in the state representing the interests of all physicians and physicians-in-training. Since 1892, ArMA has been advancing patient care and providing its members with leadership, advocacy, education, and community. Alongside our members, we foster the practice of medicine, champion patient care, and strengthen the communities we serve. For more information, visit www.AZmed.org and follow ArMA on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter/X, and LinkedIn. 


Media Contact: 

Shelby Job
(602) 291-4670
sjob@AZmed.org

By Admin User • September 18, 2026
Statewide orders keep pharmacists and physicians authorized to vaccinate Arizonans amid uncertainty over the next ACIP meeting. Statewide Orders Cover the 2026-27 Flu & COVID Season The Arizona Department of Health Services has issued statewide standing orders supporting access to the 2026-27 influenza and COVID-19 vaccines approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Arizonans seeking a flu or COVID-19 vaccine should contact their physician or pharmacy to confirm availability. Why the Orders Were Issued Arizona pharmacists may administer vaccines recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, vaccines recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for international travel, or vaccines authorized under a prescription, including a physician-issued public health standing order. With the timing of the next ACIP meeting uncertain, ADHS worked with the Arizona Board of Pharmacy to issue statewide standing orders for the flu and COVID-19 vaccines, which function as a prescription allowing pharmacists and physicians across Arizona to administer them to anyone who wants one. ADHS Medical Advisor Weighs In "Vaccines are one of the most important tools we have to protect our communities. The Influenza and COVID-19 vaccines have been proven safe and effective at preventing severe illness, hospitalization, and death. Vaccines help us limit the spread of disease, reduce pressure on our healthcare system and reduce costs," said Dr. Richard Carmona, ADHS public health medical advisor and the 17th U.S. Surgeon General. "We have issued these standing orders to ensure safe and timely access to the vaccines in alignment with scientific and evidence-based guidance." What Arizonans Should Know The standing orders do not require every pharmacy to offer vaccinations, and they do not guarantee insurance coverage for administration. Coverage and out-of-pocket costs vary by plan, so Arizonans should check with their insurance provider before scheduling an appointment. 
By Admin User • September 18, 2026
State attorneys seek an emergency stay after lower courts reject bids to delay receivership of the prison health care system. State Makes a Last-Ditch Appeal Attorneys for the Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry asked the U.S. Supreme Court this week to delay a court-ordered receivership of the state's prison health care system. The request comes after both a federal district court and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined to pause the takeover. In the recent application, former U.S. Solicitor General Paul Clement, a representative of the department, argued that the state deserves more time to make its case before surrendering control of its operations, including oversight of its employees and health care budget. Roots of the Case The dispute began in 2012 when inmates sued the department, alleging the prison system's inadequate medical, mental health, and dental care amounted to cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. The case went through years of litigation and a failed settlement agreement. In 2023, U.S. District Judge Roslyn Silver ruled that the health care system was "grossly inadequate." The court ordered the prison healthcare system to comply with more than 150 "quality indicators," but according to court-appointed monitors, the department failed to comply with 131 of the measures. In light of this finding, Silver named Annette Chambers-Smith, former director of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, to take over as receiver effective Oct. 19. Arguments on Both Sides Clement argues receivership should be the last resort and that Silver moved to it too quickly. He asserts that the department has made measurable progress, including growing its health care staffing by more than 50%, expanding substance-use treatment access, and adopting a new care model. Corene Kendrick, deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Union National Prison Project, which represents the roughly 25,000 people incarcerated in Arizona prisons, called the department's request a "Hail Mary" and said Silver had given the department years of opportunities to comply before ordering receivership. What Happens Next The Supreme Court has not yet set a deadline for the plaintiffs to respond to the stay request. Separately, the 9th Circuit is now reviewing the merits of the receivership order itself. The department filed its opening brief on Sept. 15, and the plaintiffs' response is due Oct. 15. Information in this article was sourced from the Arizona Mirror .